This article critically examines the works of YU Ying-shi (1930-2021), CHANG Hao (1936-2022), and CHEN Lai (1952-), focusing on their application of the “Axial Age” thesis to interpret the religious dimensions of early Chinese thought. YU highlights the religiosity inherent in the “inward transcendence” that emerged in Chinese thought following the Axial breakthrough. CHANG posits that China’s “incomplete transcendence” facilitated the enduring unity of state and religion throughout its history. In contrast, CHEN emphasizes the continuity and humanistic orientation of early Chinese thought and culture, thereby ques-tioning the validity of the Axial breakthrough thesis. This article suggests that such an examination not only enhances our understanding of the religious ele-ments in early Chinese thought but also deepens our comprehension of the his-tory of modern scholarship and the interaction between grand theories and spe-cific case studies.