我國公務人員考績項目改進之探討   全文下載

Probing into the Improvement of Performance Review Items for Taiwanese Public Fuctionary

由管理學或行政學學理上之研究，可將每一機關公務人員區分為三個階層－－策略（決策）、管理、操作（技術）階層，由於每一階層各個分子，其「職務高低」、「工作性質」與「任務特性」亦有顯著不同，因而欲建立客觀之考績評核制度，必須就每一受考者之考評因素與標準，皆能充分與其現職「職務高低」與「工作性質」相契合，始能在同中求異，才能真正使考績達成其制度目標「綜覈名實，信賞必罰，準確客觀」（即現行公務人員考績法第2條規定）。
本文綜就學理、假設、分析及引證，並就我國公務人員考評因素或標準詳加研析，實際上我國公務人員有二種考績表，然而表內之考評因素或標準卻無從突顯每一受考者「職務高低」、「工作性質」及「任務特性」，乃就學者理論（三個階層）及先進國家具體作法，從而建議將我國公務人員考績項目中所列工作細目的考評因素及標準，作三種不同規劃，設若能依所規劃之考績表，建立考評因素與標準，則考績制度將較能落實有效，並能發揮其制度之正功能與目標。

According to the study of the theories of management and administration, public functionaries in each organization can be classified into three kinds of level–strategy (decision-making) level, management level, and operation (technique) level. Since the significant differences exist in“rank of job function”,“nature of job”, and“character of duty”for members in each level, those who intending to establish performance review system must consider that the review factors and standards for each examinee should fully match his (her) current“rank of job function”and“nature of job”to find the dissimilarities from similarities. It’s the only way to reach the target of the system: seamlessness between name and reality, clear distinction between reward and penalty, preciseness and objectiveness. (Refer to current public functionaries performance review regulation, section 2)
This article synthesizes theories, assumptions, analyses, and citations, as well as analyzes current performance review factors and standards for public functionaries in Taiwan. Actually there are two kinds of performance review tables in Taiwan, but performance review factors and standards in the list can’t manifest“rank of job function”,“nature of job”, and“character of duty”for each examinee. Based on scholars’theories (three kinds of level) and specific practices in advanced countries, I suggest make three kinds of planning through job details and review factors and standards listed from performance review items for public functionaries in Taiwan. If the performance review table can be made as the planning to establish review factors and standards, performance review system will be fulfilled and effective, as well as develop positive function and target from the system.