英文摘要 |
The aim of study is to compare the effect of different models of integrating computer simulation in Argumentation-Based Inquiry on student science learning. The subjects consist of 178 seventh grade students assigned into four groups including traditional lecture teaching group (T), integrating Power Point in Argumentation-Based Inquiry teaching group (PA), integrating Teacher’s Simulation in Argumentation-Based Inquiry teaching group (TA), and integrating Students’ Simulation in Argumentation-Based Inquiry teaching group (SA). The results reveal that students in SA, TA and PA group perceived significantly higher than the traditional group on the learning environment. In addition, students in SA and TA groups performed significant higher than students in PA and T groups on achievement test of genetics. Finally, comparing students at different achievement levels, high achievers had good learning performance in all the teaching models, middle and low achievers only perform better by the teaching models of integrating computer simulation in Argumentation-based inquiry than traditional lecture teaching. |