論我國民事檢察權的運行方式與功能承擔

On the Operation Modes and Functions of the Civil Procuratorial Power in China

抗訴與檢察建議是現行法上民事檢察權運行的兩種方式，民事檢察權的功能因運行方式的不同而有不同。抗訴旨在監督審判權，同時通過再審程序發揮著救濟當事人的功能，但實際運作中兩種功能相互牽制，顧此失彼。只有剔除抗訴的監督功能，將抗訴的功能定位於救濟當事人，才能依據當事人主義的要求對抗訴制度加以規制，從根本上保障當事人的私權不受侵犯。而檢察建議不受當事人主義的牽絆，也不會侵蝕判決的穩定性及司法裁量權，在監督審判權方面具有天然優勢，應通過完善其程序性規定來強化監督效果。

The protest and the suggestion are two function modes of the civil procuratorial power. The original purpose of the civil procuratorial protest is to supervise the judicial power, but actually its function is to relieve the party involved by starting the retrial procedure. In practice, eliminating the supervision function of the protest and orientating the function as relief for the parties can regulate the protest system through the adversary system, which fundamentally protects the parties from infringement. The procuratorial suggestion is not stumbled by the adversary system and won't endanger the judgment stability and judicial discretion. It has natural advantage in supervising the judicial power and the dilemma in practice stems from the shortage of the procedure efficacy, which should strengthen the supervision by better procedure provision.