英文摘要 |
This study tried to use ''Document Analysis'' and aggregate the policies and regulations concerning ''After-School Child Care'', discussed the legality and appropriateness of the task about ''After-School Child Care'' that elementary school full-time teachers assumed, from the viewpoints of ''part-time job'' and ''overtime''. Full-time teachers at public elementary schools are employed as after-school service personnel and these teaching actions are supported by ordinances. The completed tasks are not related to the ''Position'' of full-time teachers.The hourly salaries they received after work cannot be treated as ''overtime pay''.Today the competent authority has not set a norm for the total teaching number of corresponding course about full-time teachers.Based on ensuring the quality of teaching and Article 165 of the Constitution about safeguarding educators, this study suggested that competent authority should set maximum number of sessions about full-time teachers assumed service personnel in ''AfterSchool Child Care'' class, referencing teaching extra classes(substitute classes), overtime lectures, focused on the position currently held, according to two periods of work and non-work. |