Teacher support is a critical factor influencing students’ active involvement in the learning process. A warm and nurturing classroom environment, cultivated by teachers, is instrumental in fostering students’ emotional and behavioral engagement with academic material. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory posits that individual behavior is a product of the interaction between the individual’s internal thoughts, the individual’s emotions, and the environment. Consequently, although teacher support influences student engagement, this relationship is mediated by students’ internal cognitive and emotional processes. In essence, the effects of teacher support extend beyond the immediate classroom. Teachers influence the psychological well-being of students and academic engagement.
To date, no empirical study has investigated students’ perceptions of teacher support, anxiety, self-efficacy, and their interplay with student engagement. Students’ academic portfolios are typically composed of two has investigated students learning outcomes and multiple performances. Although these sections differ in content, studies exploring potential disparities in the factors influencing student engagement within these portfolio categories or the mediating mechanisms underlying these differences are limited.
Accordingly, this study had three objectives: (1) examine the current levels of perceived teacher support, anxiety, self-efficacy, and engagement among senior high school students in relation to both learning outcomes and multiple performance components of their academic portfolios; (2) examine the sequential mediating role of anxiety about learning outcomes and self-efficacy for learning outcomes in the relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in learning outcomes; and (3) examine the sequential mediating role of multiple performance anxiety and multiple performance self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived teacher support in multiple performance and student engagement in multiple performance.
To attain the aforementioned objectives, a convenience sampling approach was employed to gather data. A questionnaire survey was administered to 911 senior high school students from public schools in Kaohsiung and Pingtung. The instruments used included adapted versions of the perceived teacher support scale, student engagement scale, student anxiety scale, and student self-efficacy scale. Descriptive statistical analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis were conducted to explore the variables’ characteristics and relationships. The hypothesized sequential mediation effects were tested using SPSS PROCESS macro model 6. The convenience sampling method was selected for its practical advantages, allowing efficient data collection within the study’s constraints.
The study findings revealed the following: (1) High school students reported moderate levels of perceived teacher support, anxiety, self-efficacy, and engagement when constructing both learning outcomes and multiple performance components of the academic portfolios. (2) After controlling for gender and family socioeconomic status, anxiety and self-efficacy sequential mediating the relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in both portfolio sections. These results provide valuable insights into the relationship between teacher support and student engagement in learning. (3) Students’ anxiety regarding both learning outcomes and multiple performances were positively correlated with engagement. Additionally, notable differences in “anxiety about learning outcomes” and “anxiety about multiple performance” were observed among senior secondary students based on gender and grade level. To effectively support diverse learners in constructing their academic portfolios, tailoring teacher support and counseling behaviors is essential to address these differences and help them overcome related challenges.
The study findings led to the following recommendations:
(1) Academic portfolios comprise two primary components: learning outcomes and multiple performances. These elements differ significantly in content and purpose. Learning outcomes represent the knowledge and skills students have acquired through formal classroom instruction. Conversely, multiple performances showcase practical applications of knowledge beyond the classroom, encompassing a variety of tasks, activities, or projects that demonstrate skill acquisition and real-world application. By clearly differentiating these components, educators can empower students to effectively navigate the dual challenges presented by learning outcomes and multiple performances.
(2) Teachers and schools play a pivotal role in cultivating not only students’ academic prowess but also their presentation and performance abilities. Educators should consider implementing strategies to provide both direct and indirect support for students engaged in multiple performance components of the academic portfolios. Direct support may involve targeted coaching, constructive feedback, and technical guidance specific to the nature of each performance. Conversely, indirect support involves fostering a supportive learning environment, promoting peer collaboration, and offering resources for self-directed learning. To optimize student success, teachers and schools should clearly delineate the distinctions between learning outcomes and multiple performances and establish corresponding counseling and support mechanisms.
(3) A comprehensive understanding of the distinct characteristics and underlying causes of anxiety related to learning outcomes and multiple performances among diverse student populations is essential. Tailored counseling interventions should be implemented to address these specific anxieties.
Given the heterogeneity of student experiences, a nuanced examination of anxiety related to both learning outcomes and multiple performances in academic portfolios is imperative. Students from diverse backgrounds and of various ages and genders may exhibit distinct anxiety patterns toward these portfolio components. Recognizing and understanding differences between students can enable educators to provide targeted support. By fostering a climate where students feel valued, supported, and empowered to manage anxiety, institutions can enhance overall student well-being and academic success.