歐美大型科技公司數據隱私反壟斷規制爭議分析與啓示

An Analysis of Data Privacy Antitrust Regulation Disputes of Big Technology Companies in Europe and the United States and its Enlightenments

儘管歐美反壟斷執法機構對大型科技公司加強了數據隱私反壟斷，但是理論界對于是否應將個人數據隱私納入反壟斷規制、是否要為加強數據隱私保護而拆分大型科技公司等存在較大爭議。爭議各方均有一定的理由。通過分析這些理由，可以發現歐美大型科技公司數據隱私反壟斷規制實踐對于我國具有如下借鑒意義：數據壟斷風險是對其加強數據隱私反壟斷規制的現實基礎；消費者福利是數據隱私反壟斷規制的主要考量因素；慎用反壟斷法的企業拆分規制大型科技公司數據壟斷風險。

Although the European and the United States antitrust law enforcement agencies have strengthened the anti-monopoly of data privacy on big technology companies, there is a great controversy in the theoretical circle about whether personal data privacy should be included in anti-monopoly regulations and whether big technology companies should be split up to strengthen data privacy protection. All sides in the dispute have some reasons. Through the analysis of these reasons, we can find that the practice of data privacy antitrust regulation against big technology companies in Europe and the United States has the following significance for our country: data monopoly risk is the realistic basis for strengthening data privacy anti-monopoly regulation; Consumer welfare is the main consideration of data privacy antitrust regulation; The anti-monopoly law should be used to regulate the data monopoly risk of big technology companies.