| 英文摘要 |
Action research can assist teachers in clarifying and resolving problems arising from their own teaching practices, thereby improving teaching quality and enhancing student learning outcomes. It is applicable to instructional improvement and innovation across all educational levels, including teaching practice research conducted by university faculty. To achieve these outcomes through action research, participating teachers are expected to maintain self-openness throughout all stages of the research process. However, educators engaged in action research may develop forms of self-closure due to various influencing factors, which can hinder the full realization of its potential benefits. This paper first discusses the processes and methods of action research, as well as the requirement of self-openness that participants should sustain throughout the research process. It then draws on the author’s prior action research experiences to identify four forms of self-closure that may arise among practitioners, along with their underlying causes, and proposes possible ways to prevent and address them. Specifically, participants in action research should develop a critical understanding of what is meant by“bridging the gap between theory and practice,”as this notion is often misunderstood. External theories should be regarded as one of several reference resources for problem solving and approached with a critical stance. Furthermore, educators engaged in action research should openly reflect on their own and others' perspectives and utterances during the processes of questioning and debate. Action researchers may also deliberately employ written prompts and seek the support of critical friends to avoid being constrained by external theories and to overcome self-defensiveness during processes of inquiry and argumentation. These strategies can also help prevent rigid patterns of thinking and action that may arise from habitual practice. |