| 英文摘要 |
Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) relies on a variety of tools, each with its own strengths and limitations, and no single method can fully meet all clinical needs. Diagnostic delays are particularly common in patients with low bacillary burden, immunocompromised individuals, and those with extrapulmonary TB. The limited sensitivity of conventional acid-fast stain (AFS) and the prolonged turnaround time of culture further highlight the need for rapid and accurate molecular diagnostic tools. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) offer high specificity and significantly shorten the time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, demonstrating the clinical value particularly in patients with smear-negative results. However, the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is influenced by specimen type and laboratory procedures, leading to considerable variability in sensitivity and specificity across different settings. In addition, PCR cannot distinguish between viable and nonviable organisms and therefore cannot replace culture and comprehensive drug susceptibility testing. In clinical practice and public health applications, a multimodal diagnostic approach is essential. The selection of appropriate diagnostic methods should be guided by patient-specific factors—such as bacillary load, immune status, and specimen type—as well as available healthcare resources. By integrating culture with early use of NAATs (including Xpert platforms, PCR, and line probe assays), it is possible to improve diagnostic performance and support timely treatment decisions while maintaining the ability to assess drug resistance. |