| 英文摘要 |
This study takes the historic building“Qionglin Jinyufeng Rice Mill”in Hsinchu County, Taiwan, as its primary case study to explore whether industrial facilities possess not only historical and architectural significance, but also a“scientific value”that has long been overlooked within cultural heritage discourse. The study points out that current research on industrial cultural heritage has mainly focused on historical narratives, architectural forms, and spatial preservation, while paying relatively little attention to how these industrial facilities actually operated. As a result, many rice mills have been preserved merely as“old buildings,”rather than being understood as integrated production systems involving technology, energy utilization, and local operational knowledge. Through historical documents, map analysis, field investigation, and spatial observation, this study reconstructs the operational system of the“Qionglin Jinyufeng Rice Mill.”The findings reveal that the rice mill was originally established based on the stable water supply and elevation difference provided by the Xiashan Irrigation Canal. By using waterwheels, flywheels, and transmission shafts, natural hydraulic power was converted into the energy required for rice milling. Therefore, the building space was not simply designed to accommodate machinery, but was shaped according to the requirements of power transmission, production processes, and operational needs. After World War II, as energy sources gradually shifted from hydropower to diesel engines and electricity, both the building layout and equipment arrangement continued to change, reflecting the long-term evolution of local technology and production systems under different historical conditions. This study argues that the true significance of the“Qionglin Jinyufeng Rice Mill”lies not only in the waterwheel or rice milling machinery themselves, but also in how local communities utilized irrigation systems, hydraulic power, spatial organization, and accumulated operational experience to establish a sustainable production system. Therefore, the preservation of industrial cultural heritage should not be limited to conserving buildings or machinery alone, but should further seek to understand the technological principles, production processes, and local knowledge embedded within these facilities. In other words, future cultural heritage research and preservation practices should place greater emphasis on the“scientific value of cultural heritage”embodied in industrial facilities, in addition to their historical and architectural significance. |