文化價值觀視角下的復原力輪廓：以霍夫斯泰德理論解析臺灣高中生的復原力樣貌

Resilience Profiles under Multicultural Characteristics: Analyzing Taiwanese High School Students’Resilience Patterns through Hofstede’s Theory

本研究採用霍夫斯泰德文化維度理論為分析架構，透過混合研究法探討臺灣高中生在四個文化維度（長期導向LT、權力距離PD、不確定性迴避UA及集體主義CLLSM）與復原力（RE）之關聯。量化分析（N=585）顯示臺灣高中生整體呈現中高度長期導向（LT平均3.71）、較低權力距離（PD平均2.77）、中高度不確定性迴避（UA平均3.68）、中等集體主義（CLLSM平均3.11）及中高度復原力（RE平均4.34）。迴歸分析發現長期導向（解釋變異6.53%）與集體主義（解釋變異5.56%）為復原力的主要預測因子，不確定性迴避具微弱預測力（1.05%），權力距離則無顯著影響。質性研究透過八位高中生訪談，發現四個主要主題：（1）權力距離實踐從明顯控制轉向隱性期待，青少年發展差異化回應策略；（2）長期導向呈現差異化轉化機制，積極轉化型將挫折重構為學習機會，動力消解型則出現知行分離；（3）不確定性迴避反映在溝通風格從迂迴委婉轉向直接表達；（4）集體主義表現為多元支持網絡的策略性整合，成為復原力關鍵保護因子。研究發現長期導向與集體主義構成臺灣高中生復原力發展的核心文化驅動力，而權力距離的影響關鍵在於協商方式而非強弱程度。研究結果對文化敏感的青少年心理健康實務與校園輔導具重要參考價值。

This study employed Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory and mixed methods to examine relationships between Taiwanese high school students’cultural dimensions (Long-term Orientation [LT], Power Distance [PD], Uncertainty Avoidance [UA], Collectivism [CLLSM]) and resilience (RE). Quantitative results (N=585) showed moderate-to-high long-term orientation (M=3.71), lower power distance (M=2.77), moderate-to-high uncertainty avoidance (M=3.68), moderate collectivism (M=3.11), and moderate-to-high resilience (M=4.34). Regression analysis identified long-term orientation (6.53% variance explained) and collectivism (5.56% variance explained) as primary resilience predictors, with uncertainty avoidance showing weak effects (1.05%) and power distance showing none. Qualitative interviews with eight students revealed four themes: (1) power distance practices shifting from overt control to implicit expectations; (2) long-term orientation displaying differentiated transformation mechanisms—positive transformers reframing setbacks as opportunities versus motivation-dissolution types showing knowledge-action separation; (3) uncertainty avoidance reflected in communication shifts from indirect to direct expression; (4) collectivism manifesting through strategic integration of diverse support networks as key protective factors. Findings indicate long-term orientation and collectivism constitute core cultural drivers of resilience among Taiwanese high school students, while power distance impact depends on negotiation methods rather than intensity. Results provide valuable insights for culturally sensitive adolescent mental health practices and school counseling services.