| 英文摘要 |
Play is central to children’s daily lives, providing opportunities to explore objects and their environment, engage in social interaction. Play also serves as an important window for understanding various aspects of child development. Previous studies on language development have used spontaneous language sample from play contexts to examine children’s communicative and language abilities. However, most studies using language sample analysis on Mandarin-speaking children have focused on preschool-aged populations, investigations of toddlers’language development through language sample analysis remain relatively limited. Toddlerhood is a period of rapid change in cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional domains. However, how Mandarin-speaking toddlers’semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic abilities develop with age, and how their early language skills in play relate to later cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional outcomes, remain insufficiently understood and warrant further examination. The present study aims to investigate the development of children’s language skills in parent-child interactions during play over time, and the relationship between children’s early language skills and their later development in the domains of cognition, language and social emotion. Three specific goals of this study are: (1) to examine the developmental changes in children’s semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2; (2) to assess the association between children’s semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2 and their cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development at 3;0; (3) to explore which children’s language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2 best predict children’s cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development at 3;0. Thirty-six 14-month-old children (21 boys, 15 girls) and their parents living in northern Taiwan participated in this two-year longitudinal study. All participating children in this study spoke Mandarin Chinese as their first language, and were immersed in a Mandarin environment. All children and their parents were visited at home when the children were 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2. Parents were instructed to play with their children as they usually did at home during each visit, and a set of toys, including puppets, jigsaw puzzles, and Legos, was provided for children and parents to play. Parent-child interactions during play were videotaped, and approximately 15 minutes of videotaped sessions were included in the analyses. Language samples of parent-child interactions during play were transcribed and analyzed using the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES), and the utterances and words in the transcripts were segmented based on the Taiwan Corpus of Child Mandarin (TCCM) word segmentation rules. The measures of early language production, including frequency of vocalization, total number of words (TNW), total number of different words (NDW), total number of internal state terms (IST), mean length of utterance (MLU), and mean length of turn by words (MLT-w) were used to assess children’s semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance. When the children were 3;0, their cognitive, linguistic and social-emotional abilities were evaluated using the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT). Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 23.0 software. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to analyze whether there were statistically significant differences in semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance in children at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2 and the cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development of children at 3;0. Stepwise regression analysis was also used to identify important predictors of cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development in children at 3;0. Three major findings were found in this study. First, we examined the developmental changes in children’s semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2, and found that children’s language performance, i.e., total number of words, total number of different words, total number of internal state terms, mean length of utterance, and mean length of turn by words, improved significantly with age, but the frequency of vocalization decreased significantly over time. Second, we assess the association between children’s semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic language performance at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2 and their cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development at 3;0, and found that children’s expressive vocabulary ability at 1;8 and 2;2 had significant positive correlations with their cognitive development at 3;0. The production of children’s vocalization at 1;8 and the children’s expressive vocabulary ability at 2;2 had significant correlations with their linguistic and social-emotional development at 3;0. Third, we explore which language performance of children at 1;2, 1;8, and 2;2 are important predictors of cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development at 3;0, and found that total number of different words at 1;8 was an important predictor of cognitive development at 3;0; the frequency of vocalization at 1;8 was an important predictor of linguistic and social-emotional development at 3;0; the total number of internal state terms at 2;2 was an important predictor of cognitive, linguistic and social-emotional development at 3;0. This study demonstrated that children’s semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic language performance in parent-child play interactions improved significantly between 1;2 and 2;2. Moreover, the rate of semantic growth was faster between 1;8 and 2;2 than between 1;2 and 1;8. This pattern aligns with prior research on lexical development indicating that children often undergo a“vocabulary spurt”around one and a half years old, during which expressive vocabulary expands rapidly, consistent with our findings regarding trajectories of semantic development. The study further demonstrated that children’s total number of words, total number of different words, and mean length of turn by words at 1;8, as well as their total number of different words and total number of internal state terms at 2;2, were positively correlated with cognitive development at 3;0. In addition, the critical predictors of cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development at 3;0 varied by earlier developmental stage. Specifically, the total number of different words at 1;8 and total number of internal state terms at 2;6 predicted cognitive outcomes at 3;0, whereas frequency of vocalization at 1;8 and total number of internal state terms at 2;2 predicted linguistic and social-emotional development at 3;0. These shifts in predictive indicators likely reflect developmental changes in the salience of different aspects of early language. Consistent with Tamis-LeMonda and Bornstein (1994), who argued that not all aspects of early language development equally capture associations with other developmental domains and that age-appropriate linguistic indicators vary across developmental periods, our study also found that vocabulary diversity at 1;8, rather than vocabulary size, was the strongest predictor of later cognitive outcomes. Together, these findings underscore the developmental importance of vocabulary diversity during the toddler period. This study provided valuable insights into the developmental trajectories of children’s language skills in parent-child play interactions over time, and the relationship between children’s early language skills and their later development in the domains of cognition, language and social emotion. Nonetheless, this study still had some limitations. First, the sample was followed only until 36 months of age and consisted primarily of families from middle to high socioeconomic backgrounds, which limits the generalizability of the findings to older children or to families from more diverse socioeconomic contexts. Second, the study examined only quantitative linguistic indicators of children’s semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic abilities and did not incorporate analyses of maternal linguistic input or parent-child interaction patterns. Therefore, we suggest that future studies could include children from a broader range of ages and socioeconomic backgrounds and investigate how parental communicative behaviors and interaction styles shape children’s developmental outcomes. |