| 英文摘要 |
TheCivilCodehasestablishedtheembryonicformoftheestateadministratorsystem.Duetothelackofspecificandcomprehensiveconstruction,theestateadministratorsysteminpracticefacessignificantproblems.However,basedonthecommonalitiesandconnectionsinsocialdevelopment,itisnecessarytodrawonthelegislativeexperienceofadvanceddevelopedcountries,TheUniformProbateCodeisoneofthesamplesforreference.Therulesregardingtheselection,powers,andsupervisionofestateadministratorsintheUniformProbateCodeareworthcarefullycomparingandtasting.Intermsofselection,weneedtoreflectonthenarrowscopeofappointmentforestateadministratorsinChinaandbewaryofopportunisticphenomenaprevalentintheselectionprocess;Intermsofauthority,itisnecessarytobaseonthecontentofthewillandappropriatelylimitthescopeofauthorityfromapragmaticperspective;Intermsofsupervision,reason-ablereasonsforremovalshouldbeestablishedandrestraintshouldbemaintained.Itisalsoworthdiscussingwhethertopromotemarket-orientedandspecializedoperationofheritagemanagement.ItisnecessarytomakeacautiousdecisionbasedonfactorssuchasChina'ssocio-economicconditions,marketcompetitionlevel,andpublicawareness,andgraduallymovefromdifficultiestoinnovation,ultimatelyenvisioningthefutureoftheChinesestyleheritagemanagementsystem. |