| 英文摘要 |
Preventing corporate misconduct through administrative regulation is a prevailing practice globally. The CPC Central Committee and the State Council have repeatedly emphasized the necessity of preventing corporate offenses by strengthening collaborative governance-style administrative regulation covering ex-ante, interim, and ex-post stages. However, current academic research predominantly focuses on the investigation and punishment of committed crimes, failing to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the intrinsic relationship between corporate operational behavior during the regulatory phase and the mitigation or exemption of liability in foreign jurisdictions. To perfect the collaborative administrative regulation aimed at“addressing issues at the source and preventing potential risks,”it is essential to ground the approach in the principle of culpability. Theoretically, it must be clarified that a corporation's proactivity and initiative in cooperating with regulation should serve as the basis for assessing its subjective fault and determining liability reduction. This will enhance the collaborative governance model involving administrative organs, judicial organs, and enterprises as multi-stakeholders. At the institutional level, the Criminal Law and the Administrative Penalty Law should establish the principle of culpability, explicitly stipulating that corporate proactivity during the regulatory process constitutes grounds for leniency or exemption. Furthermore, the system should implement the extension from individual case handling to industry-wide prevention through the reverse linkage between“Administrative Law and Criminal Law”; meanwhile, from the perspective of facilitating the investigation of corporate crime, the mechanism of forward linkage between“Administrative Law and Criminal Law”should be improved. |