依違之間——浙中王門季本《大學》改本內涵及其意義

Granting or Reproving: The Contents and Meaning of Jiben’s Modified The Great Learning

明代陽明學與儒家經典文本的關連性，恐怕遠超過陽明本人所表現與思維的，這一點已為不少學者所指出。以陽明為例，良知之教的建立與流傳，與古本《大學》實有著密不可分的關係。
歷來追隨陽明的首批弟子，即使自有創說，在《大學》版本的擇取上，多依師說採古本。惟甚早拜於座下的浙中王門季彭山（1485-1563），在致仕之暇，以弘揚師說為目的，大量注疏儒家經典文本，自亦包含《大學》，然卻自行改本，撰《大學私存》一書。書中雖屢對朱子主張提出質疑與批判，然其論述方式或部分觀點，卻又不自覺地跟著朱子的腳根轉矣。
本文亟欲探究彭山《大學私存》改本的內涵及特色，據此一窺其思想是如何在朱學與王學中擺盪，並藉此檢視其改本意圖及其意義，期能具體地呈現陽明後學與儒家經典的關係。

The connection of with the Wang Yang-ming’s school and the Confucianists' classics, I'm afraid that exceeds what Yang-ming behaved and imagined in Ming Dynasty, which has been noted recently by modern scholars. Taking Yang-ming as an example, his doctrine could not be set up or spread without old edition of The Great Learning.
Even the disciples have one’s own views on the innate knowledge, the most follow Yang-ming’s statement–adopting old edition of The Great Learning. Only Jiben who followed Yang-ming in early years changed the content by himself, what puzzles us that Jiben regarded publicizing the teacher's doctrine as his own ambition by writing a large number of books which annotating the Confucianists' classics. Though he often criticized the opinion of Zhu-xi, his thoughts was influenced by Zhu’s unconsciously.
This essay would explore the contents and meaning of this book, and observe how Ji’s thoughts vacillating between Zhu’s and Wang’s doctrine. According to these discussions to research into the causes of Jiben changing the contents of old edition of The Great Learning , and present the relation of the Confucianists' classics and Wang Yang-ming’ school concretely.