| 英文摘要 |
I use Weng Fang-Gang’s Shi-Zhou Shihua as the main text, and then search the content related to Su Shi, Huang Ting-Jian and the difference and similarities between Tang and Song poetry. Hereby, it shows how the pro-Song shihuas, written in Qianlong and Jiaqing dynasties, demonstrate the characteristics of Song poetry and the difference and similarities between Tang and Song poetry. Shi-Zhou Shihua highly praises Su, who uses allusions innovatively, as the best poet in Song dynasty. It also admires Huang’s works for its loftiness, vastness, deepness, freshness and learning from the past and creating the future. Above all, it uncovers that Tang poetry portraits images ingeniously and Song’s discourses things rationally. Song poets develop the skills of argument, the collection of novels and the subtlety of poems. The virtue of Song’s studies bases on plenty of reading and sophisticated analysis, leading to discussing things in detail. For this reason, we could find historical evidence in the poems, which may not be recorded in the authorized history. In addition, by way of commenting Wu Zhi-Zhen’s Song Shi-Chao, and criticizing the gain and loss of shihuas in Ming and Qing dynasties on Song poetry, would promote better understanding for Weng’s “Chi-Li.” Whether how shihuas in Qianlong and Jiaqing dynasties interpret the traits of Song poetry, it helps us evaluate the status of Song poetry and Song style in the history of Chinese literature, as well as Miao Yue’s “the difference and similarities between Tang and Song poetry” and Qian Zhong-Shu’s “demarcation between Tang and Song Poetry.” |