| 英文摘要 |
Poetry, according to Zhao Mei Zhan Yan, should avoid banality and cliché. It should rather strive for its own unique style, rich in theme and concept, brilliance in the coinage of words—creative neologism is highly encouraged. Furthermore, poetry ought to stir awe and commotion on readers and idyllic poetic style, that is, focus on the expressiveness of themes and images. These imply creative neologism and uniqueness as the art of writing poetry. Fang Dongshu thinks that poetry should include: richness, creativity, originality, newness, variation, and awe to produce certain aesthetic aura. The ideas also correlate with that of open-mindedness, pliability, creativity, uniqueness and newness, stressing too the originality of writing poetry and not merely mimicking other's work—an idea inspired by Han Yu and Huang Tingjian. Also, the concept that poetry should rely on it spiritual unity within instead of falling into worldliness is akin to that of Su Shi. This paper also dwells briefly on the mimesis-yet-beyond style of notes on poetry during the Tang and Sung Dynasty which may be helpful for analyzing the poetic style of the Sung Dynasty. How both Qian-Long and Jiaqing commented on the poetry of the Sung Dynasty will justify the latter's status on the literary history, and provides a convincing evidence for Miu Yue's saying of “differences and similarities on the poetry of the Tang and Sung Dynasty” and Qian Zhongshu on “demarcation of the poetry of the Tang and Sung Dynasty”. |