高教機構學習評量政策之內容分析：以QS Quacquarelli Symonds 2025世界大學排名前十之大學為對象

Content Analysis of Learning Assessment Policies in Higher Education Institutions: A Study of the Top Ten Universities in the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) 2025 World University Rankings

高教機構訂定學習評量政策以引導實務並保證教育的品質，已成為最優先的事務。本研究以QS 2025的世界大學排名前十的大學為對象，蒐集其官網有關學習評量政策的文件並進行內容分析，以了解學習評量政策所包含的原則與面向。本研究發現十所大學的學習評量政策具有六個共通點：1.皆考慮教學評之連貫、透明性與真實性原則；2.兼重形成性與總結性評量目的；3.評量的內容皆包含知識、技能與態度；4.評量採標準參照；5.兼採客觀測驗與變通評量；6.出席與課堂參與並未列入評量向度；7.並未說明如何評量態度面向。差異之處在於：1.只有一所大學指出自評，三所指出互評；2.有六所大學採等級制，四所採百分制。整體而言，十所大學的評量政策內容符合當代評量的理念與趨勢，但有些議題仍待探討。

Higher education institutions have prioritized the establishment of learning assessment policies to guide practices and ensure educational quality. This study focuses on the top ten universities in the QS 2025 World University Rankings, collecting relevant documents on learning assessment policies from their official websites and conducting content analysis to understand the aspects included in these policies. This study found that the assessment policies of the ten universities share six common points: 1. They all consider the principles of alignment, transparency, and authenticity in assessment; 2. They emphasize both formative and summative assessment purposes; 3. The assessment content includes knowledge, skills, and attitudes; 4. They adopt criterion-referenced assessments; 5. They incorporate both objective tests and alternative assessments; 6. Attendance and class participation are not included as assessment criteria; 7. There is no guidance on how to assess aspects of attitude. Differences include: 1. Only one university references self-assessment, whereas three mention peer assessment; 2. Six universities use a letter grading system, while four use a percentage system. Overall, the assessment policies of these ten universities align with contemporary assessment concepts and trends, although some issues remain to be explored.