| 英文摘要 |
The nations found various universities & colleges in accordance with the education laws & regulations, and assigned the functions of “university autonomy”. However, the nations also found the “local autonomy” in accordance with the Constitution and the “local autonomy”, to give the “local self-governing bodies ”the function of “local autonomy”. The matters about the governances of the universities & colleges, in principle, belong to the “central retention” in Taiwan this time. However, the universities and colleges are bound to be located in the jurisdiction of the local self-governing bodies mentioned above. How can adjust & mediate the conflicts between the two “autonomous functions” mentioned above? This study is based on the case of a discord between a public university in the Northern Taiwan involved in the “Labor Standards Law ”& the local government as the research objects of this study, and uses the some qualitative research methods such as “literature analysis”, “documentary analysis” and “individual experience summary” etc. by the approach of the policy conflict, in order to conduct research and analysis the development about the operation & adjustion of the two “autonomous functions” mentioned above. The conclusions of this study are, The nations should develop and make the professional laws for the definition of the “university autonomy”, the scope of application & the operation (including the establishment of a hierarchical system of university regulations) about the “university autonomy”, and even the various internal regulations of the universities & colleges, regarding the operations of the function about “university autonomy” based on the laws & regulations of the higher education institutions, the “local governments” should respect them, because it belongs to the “university autonomy”, it should be used to positively and actively practice the “university social responsibility”, there are some disputes & conflicts between the two “autonomy function” mentioned above. It's so better the state's administrative and legislative sectors should first establish a clear mechanism for reconciliation by the laws & regulations, next takes the state's judicial mechanism. |