刑事訴訟法的解法典化與再法典化

法典化以某一領域缺乏統一法典為前提，“刑事訴訟法的法典化”的說法在邏輯上並不成立。然而，法典化旨在解決的分散立法問題，在刑事訴訟領域同樣存在。公安司法機關各自出臺的司法解釋將《刑事訴訟法》解構並架空，造成了明顯的解法典化現象，引發了法律權威減損、法律穩定破壞、法律價值扭曲、法律體系動搖等嚴重弊病。為終結“以規代法”的局面，恢復法權威性、維護法安定性、重塑法統一性、強化法自主性，就需要對既有規範體系展開再法典化操作。在《刑事訴訟法》第四次修改的背景下，以再法典化為導向，重新審視刑事訴訟領域內的全部規範，通過適當的模式與技術，取精用宏、去蕪存菁，繼而將其完整、和諧地彙編為一部新的法典，是法典化時代應當完成的歷史重任。

The codification presupposes the absence of a unified code in a given field, making the notion of“codification of the Criminal Procedure Law”logically untenable. That being said, the issue of overly fragmented legislation, which codification aims to resolve, also exists in the field of criminal procedure. Judicial interpretation documents issued independently by public security and judicial organs have fragmented and hollowed out the Criminal Procedure Law, leading to a noticeable phenomenon of decodification. This has caused serious issues such as diminution of legal authority, erosion of legal stability, distortion of legal values, and weakening of the legal system. To address the situation of“regulations substituting for law”, restore the authority of law, maintain legal stability, reestablish legal unity, and enhance legal autonomy, a recodification of the existing normative system is necessary. Against the backdrop of the fourth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law, it is essential to re-evaluate all existing regulations in the field of criminal procedure. Through appropriate models and techniques, one should refine and consolidate these regulations, and then compile them into a new, complete, and harmonious code. This task is a historical responsibility to be fulfilled in the era of codification.