| 英文摘要 |
The practice of extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States originated from diplomatic disputes between the United States and the European powers over the claim of extraterritorial jurisdiction in the territory of the Unites States of America in the early days of the founding of the country. In terms of the weak position of the United States at that time, Justice Marshall put forward the Charming Betsy principle, arguing that the interpretation of U.S. law should not violate international law. Through a humble interpretation of the jurisdiction of the United States, it skillfully resolved the jurisdiction disputes with European powers. In the 19th century, based on the Charming Betsy principle, Justice Story proposed the principle of strict territoriality of jurisdiction in the Apollo case, the effect of which lasted until the early 20th century. In the 20th century, taking the 1909 Banana Company case as an opportunity, although the United States still adheres to the presumption of anti-extraterritorial application of federal law, the basis of the presumption of anti-extraterritorial application has changed from compliance with international law to international comity. This change also shows the jurisprudential logic of the 200-year history of extraterritorial jurisdiction in the United States, that is, from claiming that extraterritorial jurisdiction was granted by international law to proposing that extraterritorial jurisdiction was the natural sovereign power of a state when the United States was changing from a weaker to a stronger position. |