| 英文摘要 |
While both Article 9 of the ROC Constitution, providing that:“Except those in active military service, no person shall be subject to trial by a military tribunal,”and Judicial Interpretation No. 436 of the Grand Judicial Council, holding that:“The laws governing the procedure of a military trial which limit the rights of active-duty soldiers shall be in compliance with the principle of proportionality as stated in Article 23 of the ROC Constitution. In light of the spirit of protecting physical freedom and the right of instituting legal proceedings and the provision of Article 77, the defendant receiving the sentence of imprisonment in a final and conclusive judgment made by the military tribunal in peacetime shall be permitted to appeal directly to a normal court on the ground that the judgment received is in violation of the law,”recognize the court-martial system, the Criminal Procedure Code and the Military Justice Act divide the criminal justice system into two parts. In 2013, after the Congress revised Paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the Military Justice Act, providing that:“Any military personnel on active duty who commits crimes of Criminal Code of the Armed Forces or special codes concerned shall be subject to prosecution and punishment under these codes at war time,”there is only one criminal justice system at peace time. However, whether the war-time justice system is appropriate receives little attention. This study reviews the current provisions of the Military Justice Act and proposes suggestions for further consideration with viewpoints from the American military justice system. |