迪化街區保存、再生過程中，新治理裝置的萌發

Emerging the Dispositive of Regeneration in the Process of“Conserving”the Historical Dihua Neighbourhood

本文採取用傅柯「裝置」視角結合社區主體誕生，重新審視和概念化迪化街的社區保存與再生治理。我們主張此過程並非傳統二元對立（保存對抗拓寬或發展）的簡化邏輯，而是一個多元主體、異質要素與偶發連繫共同構成的去中心化治理裝置。從迪化街的歷史脈絡出發，本文指出「失去迪化街」如何在發展型國家現代化及街區轉型壓力下被重構，成為凝聚不同社群的論述基礎，並連結到危機所召喚和建構的新主體。這些社群或要角透過華人社會特有的關係網絡（Guanxi）實現鬆散但有效的合作，進而構建一種非計畫性且動態的治理實踐。本文認為，這種治理裝置的特點包括多元主體的能動性、偶發性及異質連結，展現了治理過程中的權力生產與主體生成。透過此概念架構的發展，我們得以更加貼近歷史街區保存與再生治理實踐的真實全貌。或許對於後進國家而言，這樣治理裝置的誕生脈絡、其偶發性、異質連結，及其合作或共謀，更能瞭解在轉型危機中重塑地方治理的核心。

This article adopts Foucault’s concept of“dispositive”combined with the emergence of community subjects to re-examine and reconceptualize the governance of preservation and regeneration in the Dihua neighbourhood. It argues that this process is not a simplistic binary opposition (e.g., preservation versus road widening or development), but rather a decentralized governance dispositive composed of diverse actors, heterogeneous elements, and contingent connections. Based on the historical context of Dihua Street, the article highlights how the narrative of the“loss of Dihua Street”was reconstructed under the pressures of developmental state modernization and neighbourhood transformation, becoming a discursive foundation for uniting different communities and linking new subjects summoned and shaped by the crises. These communities or key actors, through the unique Guanxi (social networks) of Chinese society, achieved loose but effective collaboration, forming a non-planned and dynamic governance practice. The study identifies key characteristics of this governance dispositive, including the agency of diverse actors, contingency, and heterogeneous linkages, illustrating the production of power and the formation of subjects within the governance process. Developing this conceptual framework, the article offers a closer understanding of the practical realities of historical neighbourhood preservation and regeneration governance. For developing countries, the context of the emergence of such governance dispositives, their contingency, heterogeneous connections, and modes of collaboration or collusion provide critical insights into reshaping local governance amidst the transitional crises.