| 英文摘要 |
This study investigates the relationship between corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and audit fees, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of information asymmetry and operating efficiency, and the moderating effect of audit quality (proxied by Big 4 audit firms). Using panel data of publicly listed firms in Taiwan from 2018 to 2023, the study employs fixed-effects regression models, Baron and Kenny's mediation analysis, non-parametric bootstrap testing, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) to address potential endogeneity. Empirical results show a significantly positive association between ESG scores and audit fees, indicating that auditors may allocate more resources and risk premiums when evaluating firms with stronger ESG disclosures. Mediation analysis reveals that information asymmetry, measured by the kv_index (price range ratio), plays a significant mediating role, while operating profit margin (OPM) does not exhibit a significant indirect effect. Heterogeneity analysis further confirms that the ESG–audit fee relationship is stronger among firms audited by Big 4 firms, suggesting heightened sensitivity to ESG-related risks among higher-quality auditors. Additionally, 2SLS analysis using lagged ESG scores as instruments confirms the robustness of the results and the presence of endogeneity. This study contributes to the auditing and ESG literature by clarifying the cost implications of ESG performance through the lens of information asymmetry and audit quality. It provides practical implications for regulators, firms, and auditors regarding ESG assurance, disclosure transparency, and audit pricing strategies in sustainability reporting environments. |