| 英文摘要 |
This study aims to explore the psychological regulatory functions of counterfactual ruguo (‘if’) clauses in Mandarin Chinese. By analyzing naturally occurring spoken data within real-life contexts, the research seeks to uncover how speakers employ counterfactual thinking to regulate their emotions and how pragmatic effects are produced and interpreted in discourse. The findings show that Mandarin counterfactual ruguo-clauses involve three distinct modes of counterfactual thinking: upward, downward, and parallel. Downward counterfactual thinking allows speakers to focus on the actual conditional situation, leading to a more positive evaluation of reality and helping to alleviate negative emotions. In contrast, upward counterfactual thinking shifts attention to the real-world outcome, prompting criticism of reality, emotional venting, and generating a sense of collective discontent. Parallel counterfactual thinking highlights possible outcomes in alternate worlds, which can help soothe emotions and enhance mutual understanding. Furthermore, the study examines how speakers often incorporate ''additional cognitive content'' when constructing counterfactual ruguo-clauses. On the one hand, this encourages listeners to engage in deeper interpretation to grasp the implied meaning, thus achieving indirect communication. On the other hand, it enables speakers to create specific pragmatic effects such as humor, tactful criticism, and irony. Finally, the study offers pedagogical insights for teaching Chinese as a second language—such as fostering learners’semantic comprehension, emotional awareness, cultural sensitivity, and advanced language expression skills. It is hoped that this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the interaction between human psychological processes and pragmatic effects in communication. |