| 英文摘要 |
The rise of online litigation in the digital age presents new opportunities for pioneering jurisdictions to take the lead in developing forward-looking rules of evidence. In practice, online litigation reveals a pattern in which traditional evidence is predominantly submitted in electronic form, while electronic evidence itself is often presented through re-transformed materials. Together, these trends have fostered a dual-track integration that bridges the physical and digital realms. This phenomenon reflects a unique pattern of“dual-track”and“dual-formation,”necessitating a rule-making approach grounded in the principle of transformed evidentiary submission: the admissibility of evidence depends not only on the original source material but also on whether the process of digital transformation produces any material impact. This principle builds upon existing theories of evidentiary transformation and further advances them by requiring a two-step analysis: first, an assessment of the equivalency based on online-specific factors, and then a return to the offline evaluation of the original evidence's formal validity. Consequently, the focus of rulemaking should shift toward the additive rules governing transformed submissions in online contexts. In light of this, China should revise its current rules that treat electronic documentary and physical evidence as equivalent to originals, introduce new provisions addressing remote testimony—particularly with respect to isolation, obstruction, and cross-border participation—and refine specialized rules on the re-transformation of digital evidence, thereby promoting precise and innovative development of evidentiary rules for online litigation. |