月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中外法学 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
在線訴訟舉證轉化件的原理及規則建構論
作者 劉品新
中文摘要
數字時代在線訴訟勃興,為先行國家推進證據規則的引領性建設提供了新的可能。在線訴訟的實踐表明,傳統證據普遍以電子化材料呈現,電子證據通常以複轉化材料遞交,二者共同促成了跨越物理與數字空間的“雙軌性”融合應用。相應的規則建構亟需遵循在線訴訟舉證轉化件原理,即證據資格既取決於源證據本身,也取決於舉證轉化過程是否造成實質性影響。該原理在繼承既有轉化件理論基礎上進一步深化,要求在線訴訟中首先依據線上疊加因素進行等同性判斷,再回歸線下形式審查源證據資格,從而確立以在線舉證轉化件的附加性規則為立規重心。基於此,我國應當調整關於電子化書證、物證“視同原件、原物”的現行規則,增補當事人、證人線上作證中的隔離、妨礙及境外作證規定,細化電子證據複轉化應用的專門性規則,以實現在線訴訟舉證規則的精細化創新。
英文摘要
The rise of online litigation in the digital age presents new opportunities for pioneering jurisdictions to take the lead in developing forward-looking rules of evidence. In practice, online litigation reveals a pattern in which traditional evidence is predominantly submitted in electronic form, while electronic evidence itself is often presented through re-transformed materials. Together, these trends have fostered a dual-track integration that bridges the physical and digital realms. This phenomenon reflects a unique pattern of“dual-track”and“dual-formation,”necessitating a rule-making approach grounded in the principle of transformed evidentiary submission: the admissibility of evidence depends not only on the original source material but also on whether the process of digital transformation produces any material impact. This principle builds upon existing theories of evidentiary transformation and further advances them by requiring a two-step analysis: first, an assessment of the equivalency based on online-specific factors, and then a return to the offline evaluation of the original evidence's formal validity. Consequently, the focus of rulemaking should shift toward the additive rules governing transformed submissions in online contexts. In light of this, China should revise its current rules that treat electronic documentary and physical evidence as equivalent to originals, introduce new provisions addressing remote testimony—particularly with respect to isolation, obstruction, and cross-border participation—and refine specialized rules on the re-transformation of digital evidence, thereby promoting precise and innovative development of evidentiary rules for online litigation.
起訖頁 760-778
關鍵詞 在線訴訟電子證據電子化證據轉化件證據規則Online LitigationElectronic EvidenceDigitized EvidenceEvidence DuplicateEvidence Rule
刊名 中外法学  
期數 202505 (219期)
出版單位 北京大學法學院
該期刊-上一篇 家庭內部非對稱型性行為的刑法定性
該期刊-下一篇 設區的市立法權限中“基層治理”的內涵厘定與實踐展開
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄