論明中期史籍之文學接受——以《史記》、《五代史記》評點及《文編》編選為探討中心

On the Literary Reception of Historical Texts in the Mid Ming Dynasty—Focusing on the Annotations of Records of the Grand Historian, Records of the Five Dynasti es, and the Compilation of Anthology of Literature

明中期文壇以復古思潮為主流，在散文方面，無論七子派或唐宋派，都主張取法古代，只是遠近不一，七子派逕學秦漢，除了個別作家，專書則以《史記》、《漢書》為學習典範；唐宋派鑑於七子末流遺神取貌的缺失，改以取徑唐宋、銜接秦漢之說矯正，他們除了積極評點古典文獻，同時編輯新總集，除了《史記》、《漢書》以外，唐宋派還增加歐陽脩《五代史記》的評點，新編總集則為唐順之《文編》、茅坤《唐宋八大家文鈔》。本文檢取其中被復古思潮作家群所用的《史記》、《五代史記》、《文編》加以觀察，企圖勾勒明代中期史籍文學化、史部集部化的文學現象及學術現象。

In the mid-Ming literary scene, the revivalist movement was the mainstream. In prose, both the Seven Masters School and the Tang-Song School advocated drawing inspiration from antiquity, though they differed in the periods they followed. The Seven Masters School focused directly on the Qin and Han dynasties, with individual writers taking Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han as learning models. The Tang-Song School, addressing the shortcomings of the Seven Masters' later followers, who imitated only the external forms of earlier works, promoted the literary styles of the Tang and Song dynasties while maintaining a connection to Qin-Han ideals. In addition to actively annotating classical texts, they compiled new anthologies. Beyond Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han, the Tang-Song School also added Ouyang Xiu’s Records of the Five Dynasties to their annotated works. Key anthologies included Tang Shunzhi’s Anthology of Literature and Mao Kun’s Selected Works of the Eight Great Prose Masters of the Tang and Song Dynasties.
This paper examines the use of Records of the Grand Historian, Records of the Five Dynasties, and Anthology of Literature by revivalist writers, attempting to outline the phenomenon of the literarization of historical texts and the merging of historical and literary collections in the mid-Ming period.