標準必要專利禁訴令全球治理的內在邏輯

The Inherent Logic of Global Governance under the Injunction Against Standard Essential Patents

禁訴令是解決管轄衝突的一種手段。然而標準必要專利領域禁訴令出現的十餘年來，各國之間的管轄權衝突並未得到消弭，反而呈現愈演愈烈的趨勢。本文結合禁訴令誕生與發展歷程中的典型案例，對禁訴令發展的歷史邏輯、禁訴令運行的法律邏輯和影響禁訴令效果的經濟邏輯進行了分析。研究發現：國際禮讓是禁訴令發出和得到尊重的基本條件；各國基於自身司法制度而發出的標準必要專利領域禁訴令之間因涉及長臂管轄和相互反制而陷入了交互式衝突；當事人對禁訴令的選擇性遵從進一步加劇了禁訴令的社會成本。據此提出了遵循國際禮讓、反制長臂管轄、構建全球管轄分配體系等完善標準必要專利禁訴令治理的中國方案。

Injunctions are a means of resolving jurisdictional conflicts. Over the past ten years since the emergence of the standard-essential patent injunction, the jurisdictional conflicts arising from standard-essential patents in various countries have not been eliminated, but the trend has become more and more intense. This paper collects the typical cases of the birth and development of the injunction, analyzes the historical logic of the development of the injunction, the legal logic of the operation of the injunction and the economic logic of the injunction. The study shows that international comity is the basic condition for the issuance and respect of the injunction. The injunctions of standard essential patents issued by different countries based on their respective judicial systems have fallen into interactive conflicts because they involve long-arm jurisdiction and mutual countermeasures. The parties' selective compliance with the injunction further aggravates the social cost of the injunction. Based on this, the author puts forward some suggestions on the governance of patent injunctive order, such as following international comity, countering long-arm jurisdiction, and constructing global jurisdiction distribution system.