| 英文摘要 |
This paper adopts an ecological perspective to re-examine the overlooked natural and animal bodies in the Taiwanese queer literary classics, which have been extensively discussed from the perspectives of nation and gender. These animal imageries often reveal the untamed ''wildness'' of marginalized sexualities and their assigned primitive imaginations. This paper suggests the concept of ''wildness'' for understanding urban queer ecology and argues that under the integrated multi-power relations among history, culture, and power, nature no longer possesses a universal essence but is a constantly changing process. While these classics have been criticized for their urban, elitist tendencies, queer ecology reveals the hierarchies and risks inherient in the city. Queer wildness, by valuing the (un)natural within the urban parks and marginalized individuals, breaks the common assumption that nature only exists in the suburbs. The paper first introduces queer ecology, Jack Halberstam's theory of the wild, and connects them with the history of queer development in Taiwan. It then analyzes two important novels, including the texts themselves and the surrounding critical discourse. The first is Crystal Boys (1983), in which the word ''wild'' appears frequently. The novel's“young birds”reveal negative emotions during illegal sex work, and their ''wild vitality'' highlights the potential of Taiwanese locality. Through the historical context of parks in the U.S. and Taiwan, the paper points out the painful price that minorities must pay when approaching nature under the hierarchies of gender and race. The second is Notes of a Crocodile (1994). The paper highlights the animal imagery of the protagonist, Crocodile, and argues that the lesbian's body exemplifies what the theory of the wild terms the 'counter-archive of bodies'. By revisiting these Taiwanese queer literary classics, we can better understand the surviving subjects under the storm of modernity. |