何焯《文選》學的梳理與試探——從「何校」與「何評」的釐正談起

Organize and observe on He Zhuo's erudition of Wenxuan－－Star with distinguish proof and comment by He Zhuo

黃焯〈文選平點敘〉盛贊：「清代《選》學未有超於何氏。」何焯儼然為清代《文選》學的標竿，其《義門讀書記》是後學窺入《文選》的重要參考之一。過去學界過存何焯的學術表現，並未關懷清代學者對其的批評，而筆者檢視到後學對於何氏《文選》學有所批評，質疑聲音不可不察。
由於完帙作品僅存《讀書記》，並不能全然代表何焯，而本研究透過比對各家散落資料，理解讀者所見不全，各執一詞；但從批評又可從而理解清儒是秉持「事必有徵，義必有本」的「考據」理念，對何氏《文選》學提出批判的聲音。因此，筆者希望透過「漢學」視域的主張，解釋乾、嘉《文選》學家檢正何焯的意義，並藉此讓我們更深入了解清代《文選》學的時代訴求。

Huang Zhuo's“The Evaluate Selected for Selections of Refined Literature”praised:“The top study of Wenxuan only He Zhuo（何焯）in the Qing Dynasty.”One of important documents that named Reading Notes by Yi-Men（義門）is wanting to learn Wenxuan. In the past, no one paid attention to fault on He Zhuo, in fact, some people criticize him in the Qing Dynasty. So, this report observed that thinking this matter is important.
The complete word in Reading Notes by Yi-Men but not at all. This report organize each scholars information that everyone is different, but scholars think it different needs to“text must appear in books & explanation must appear in classics”to appear. So be more rigorous to check He Zhuo and his note. Therefore, this report hopes to understand this phenomenon what they wanting in sinology, and by knew to persist in Wenxuan in the Qing Dynasty.