羽球訓練經驗的塊莖模式之探討─ ─樹狀思維與塊莖思維

法國哲學家德勒茲的塊莖理論有著諸多顛覆傳統的論述，以此觀點來詮釋羽球訓練經驗，得以引發許多創意聯想，並創造出意義深遠的詮釋。本文的研究路徑以「千高原」的樹狀思維代表傳統運動訓練的模式，另外以塊莖思維，代表運動訓練的創新模式。並應用「現象學式的敘事分析」，對羽球的實踐經驗，包含選手、隊友、對手、教練、體能、技術、戰術和心理等諸多因素，進行深入的剖析，以探求經驗的意義根本。研究結果發現，樹木思維代表著一種穩定、沉著的特質，而塊莖思維代表著即興、創造的特質。樹狀思維提供球員穩定性，而塊莖思維則帶來靈動性，穩定與靈動兼具是優秀球員具備的特質。塊莖風貌的核心在於打破二元思維，包含教練∕選手，對手∕自己，雙打∕單打等二元式的習慣思維。藉由「自我組織」，正視比賽的真正主角，「見招拆招」進行解域和造域，以及「聖筊組合」，融合自己和隊友，自己和對手。研究結論有三點，包含「打破框架」，「擁抱複雜」和「還原實踐」。有助於大眾理解羽球訓練實踐的多元面貌，也能引導教練和運動員找到既存視野的破口，以創新角度重新詮釋原本就熟稔羽球世界的運作。

The French philosopher Gilles Deleuze has dedicated himself to the theory of rhizome that subverts the tradition. By using this perspective to approach the badminton training experience, one can be inspired to have many creative associations and create significant interpretations. In this paper, tree thinking in A Thousand Plateaus (1980) signifies the traditional mode of sports training, while rhizome thinking suggests the novel mode of sports training. The study utilizes phenomenological narrative analysis to thoroughly examine the practical experience of badminton. This includes exploring various aspects such as players, teammates, opponents, coaches, physical fitness, techniques, tactics, and psychological factors, with the aim of uncovering the essence of the overall experience. The results of the study found that tree thinking suggests a stable and calm character, while rhizome thinking implies an improvisational, creative character. The former thinking provides the players stability, while the latter brings them agility. Meanwhile, the study wants to note that both characters such as stability and agility are what forms a good player. The core of the rhizomatic style is to break the binary thinking, such as coach vs. player, opponent vs. the player him/herself, doubles vs. singles and other binary habitual thinking. Through the concept of the“self-organization,”one faces the real player in the match and then confronts according to the opponent by deterritorialization and territorialization. Also, with the spirit of“perfect match,”one incorporates himself or herself into the player, teammate, and opponent. Three points were raised in this study, that is, (1)“breaking the framework,”(2)“embracing complexity”and (3)“restoring practice.”The three points help the public understand the diverse aspects of badminton training practice; meanwhile, they guide coaches and players to find gaps in their existing vision and reinterpret the badminton world from a new perspective.