考選制度與政策的變革與發展   全文下載

The Reform and Development of Examination System and Policies

由於考試制度之公平性，頗受國人信賴，故中央社曾報導群我倫理促進會一項有關社會信任度的民意調查顯示：在所有政府機關中考試院最受民眾所肯定。當然，在歷經第10屆各項改革衝擊，以及2003年閩南語試題與2005年律師高考國文試題爭議風波，其他如考試之公平性與機關用人需求之衡平性亦要作調整，在考選政策變革中的變與不變，其策略方向正確否？其改進方法技術精進否？均值得吾人關心與探討。本文乃就考選制度與政策之變革發展進行探討，茲舉其要者如：任用考試或資格考試---考用合一政策之變革、對身心障礙及原住民族等弱勢族群之優惠政策、國家考試的兩性平等政策、國家考試閩南語命題疑義處理、國家考試爭訟案件有關複查成績議題、考選政策之漸進授能與分權化等議題加以研析。
總體而言，未來考選政策的變革與發展，在面臨多元價值與分權思潮衝擊，考政機關的功能定位，除應作漸進而必要調整外，尤其必須扮演公務人力資源之策略管理的變革者，即在考量與因應整體組織策略人力資源管理的需要，確保在憲法所定公平競爭的原則上，以功績需要、成本效能為未來施政之評估架構與施政準則，並積極爭取國會的認同，方能落實考選政策變革之良善作為。

The fairness of examination system is trustworthy, as reported by the Central News Agency that, a survey conducted by Association for Social Ethics about social trust indicates the Examination Yuan among all government agencies receives the most acknowledgement. On the other hand, there were the impact brought by the 10th reforms, disputes over examinations about Taiwanese dialect in 2003 and lawyer’s senior examination for Chinese tests in 2005, the balance between fairness of examination and demand on personnel by agencies also requires adjustment. Concerning changing and not changing in reform of examination policies, is its strategic direction correct or not? Is the technique of improvement methods better or not? They are all worth concern and discussion. This article studies and analyzes reform and development of examination system and policies, mainly, the reform of policies combining examination and appointment–appointment examination or qualification examination, preferential polices for weak groups such as the disabled and aborigines, sex equality policy of national placement test, handling of doubtful points about Taiwanese dialect questions for national placement test, topics about application for rechecking raw scores in dispute and litigation cases, the progressive empowerment and decentralization etc. topics.
In general, the reform and development of examination policies in the future are confronted with impact of diversified values and decentralization thinking. The function positioning of examination agencies should be adjusted progressively and necessarily, in addition, it must play the role of reformer of strategic management for public service, that is, to be based on performance requirement, cost efficiency as evaluation framework and implementation principles for future governance, with the foundation of fair competition according to the Constitution, with consideration and corresponding to requirement by human resources management of overall organizational strategies. It should also strive for acknowledgment by the Congress. Only by doing this, the reform of examination policies can be really put into effect.