英文摘要 |
In 2017, Japan passed the“Private Lodging Business Act”and it has been implemented since June 2018. This is the first national law in the world to legalize accommodation sharing. This article explores how relevant stakeholders influence the institutional design of the central government’s planning of the“Private Lodging Business Act”during the legislative process of Japan’s Minpaku system, and how it affects the decision-making of local governments during the actual implementation, in order to gain a glimpse into the operation of the“Private Lodging Business Act”. This study uses stakeholder theory, through document analysis, content analysis and in-depth interviews, to observe how various stakeholders affect the development of public sector policies before and after the implementation of the“Private Lodging Business Act”policy. This study has three findings. First, when the“Private Lodging Business Act”was established, the Abe administration aimed to pass the new law. Therefore, the Minpaku issue successfully entered the regulatory review committee, and the agenda setting was conducive to the sharing economy related industry players. After the passage of the new law, platform intermediary operators also successfully obtained legal qualifications. The new law requires platform intermediaries to request Minpaku owners to apply for legal Minpaku in accordance with the law. The government also obtained relevant statistics on Minpaku to understand the development of Minpaku. Second, after the“Private Lodging Business Act”was established, based on the principle of central legislation and local self-law, local hotel associations and groups, although they failed in the Minpaku review meeting in the early stages of the enactment of the law, turned to put pressure on local governments in the later stages of the enactment of the law, resulting in some areas There are still strict restrictions on the Minpaku system. This article uses Karuizawa Town and Kyoto City as the observation objects to explore why local governments oppose the Minpaku system. It is found that when there is a dilemma between tourists and residents, the local government favors the residents’side. Third, the establishment of a stakeholder alliance is conducive to lobbying the government to promote the policy. |