英文摘要 |
From the provisions of the Civil Code and the Interpretation of the General Principles of Contract Compilation of the Civil Code on the impact of administrative approval on contract effectiveness and the legal consequences of unauthorized disposal, the“contract effectiveness”has a clear hierarchical nature in Chinese civil law. The broad validity of a contract and the broad binding force of a contract are synonymous, which are the recognition and protection of the parties' agreement by the law. The premise of a valid contract is“it is established in accordance with the law”. Therefore, there is no substantive difference between the invalidity of a contract and the non establishment of a contract. However, in order to accurately describe the legal status of a contract that has been legally established but has not yet taken effect, Chinese civil law sometimes uses the concept of contract binding force in a narrow sense and distinguishes it from the narrow concept of contract effectiveness: the former refers to the parties not revoking or terminating the contract without authorization after the contract is legally established, and not maliciously obstructing the achievement of conditions or passively treating the obligation of approval in violation of the principle of good faith; The latter refers to the fact that one party may request the other party to perform the agreed obligations based on the contract, that is, the effectiveness of performance. In addition, due to the fact that the sales contract in Chinese civil law not only includes the intention of the parties to establish a debt relationship, but also the intention of the parties to transfer ownership, the effectiveness of the sales contract should be further distinguished into performance effectiveness and transfer effectiveness. The hierarchical nature of contract effectiveness is not only an inevitable product of modern transaction stages, but also an important manifestation of the characteristics of Chinese civil law system. |