The purpose of this paper is to synthesize some of the literature on individual differences in IQ and cognitive styles. The major findings of this paper are as follows: 1. Intelligence tests do not measure “innate” or “natural” ability. 2. Intelligence tests are criticized for emphasizing verbal ability over other types of mental abilities. 3. Educators must be environmentalists and work to develop appropriate learning situations no matter how much of a child’s IQ comes from genetic factors. 4. Field-independent individuals show greater concern for more impersonal, abstract aspects of stimuli. 5. Field-dependent individuals reflect a considerable degree of social sensitivity. 6. There is evidence that cognitive style develops from socialization practices. |