莊子的「共在」與「共是」──與海德格、鄂蘭的對話

Zhuangzi’s“Being-with”and“Common Agreement”: Dialogue with Heidegger and Arendt

莊子的社會政治性一直是學界較少探討的議題，主要原因在於，莊子思想傳統上被視為與儒家之強調社會政治性不同，偏向於探討名教之外的自然。近年來由於跨文化莊子學的提出，莊子思想中的人文精神、政治社會面，得以進一步顯題化。本文希望透過海德格的「共在」與鄂蘭的「共是（共同意見）」等概念，開展莊子哲學中的社會性與政治性向度。

The socio-political dimension of Zhuangzi’s thought has been largely underdeveloped by related scholarship. This is due to the fact that scholars tend to read Zhuangzi through a lens of nature beyond the so-called“doctrine of names”名教, thereby attributing a position to Zhuangzi that fundamentally deviates from Confucians. It is noteworthy, however, that cross-cultural reinterpretations of Zhuangzi have begun to redress this disadvantageous situation. The present article aims to unfold the social-political aspects of Zhuangzi’s thought by bringing in the concepts of“being-with”and“common agreement”from the thoughts of Martin Heidegger and Hannah Arendt, respectively.