英文摘要 |
There is a conflict between the limited facts obtained under low-intensity administrative examination and the requirement of “clear facts” in administrative actions, and coordination issues should be addressed. From the perspective of functionalism, improving efficiency leads to low-intensity administrative examination, which mainly exists in the field of application based administrative actions. Low-intensity administrative examination has met the needs of “streamlining management and serving” reform and responded to the regulatory challenges brought about by it. At the normative level, structural constraints determine that low-intensity administrative examination will not disappear and is closely related to administrative registration. The coordination of low-intensity administrative examination also comes from the supporting system of in-process and post-supervision. Low-intensity administrative examination can be seen as a mechanism for defining legal facts, and the limited facts obtained can be seen as “clear legal facts”, thus eliminating the tense relationship between low-intensity administrative examination and the administrative law system. The smooth operation of low-intensity administrative examination cannot be separated from the coordinated reform of judicial review and administrative law enforcement responsibility system. |