讓教科書眾聲爭鳴：編審協力導向的政策提案

Ways toward Textbook Diversification: Editor-Reviewer Collaboration-Oriented Policy Proposals

國民中小學教科書是由民間出版業者依據課程綱要研發編輯，經政府審定後發行，由各學校自行選用，為學生學習的重要媒材，也是學生學力評量的重要依據。教科書審定制相當程度地影響教科書的研發、取材、編寫，然而，目前國民中小學教科書審定行政也存在編審權責不明與意見相左的問題，出版端認為審查端干預過多限縮創意，審查端則憂心出版端缺乏自律及品管。本文由審定制度的實務層面提出觀察與對策，讓出版端專注於品質管理與發展特色，審查端著重檢核其內容符合課程綱要理念與學科知識正確性，由制度解決編審對立僵局，促進教科書產業運作與內容設計的創意與多元。

Private-sector publishers designed, edited, and published elementary and junior high school textbooks based on curriculum guidelines. These textbooks are reviewed and approved by the National Academy for Educational Research and chosen by schools to meet students’ learning needs and to be an important basis for assessing students' academic achievement. The textbook review and approval process greatly influence textbooks’ sourcing and editing. However, defining editors’ and reviewers’ responsibilities and solving the clash of opinions between these two parties are ongoing challenges administrators face during the review process. Editors worry that the review and approval process may limit creativity, whereas reviewers are concerned with textbook content and quality. At this stage, the urgent priority is assigning private-sector publishers responsibilities and systematically defusing the tension between editors and reviewers. By closely observing the administrative operation of textbook review and approval, this study aims to offer suggestions to both editors and reviewers. The research hopes to provide recommendations for the review and approval system to help editors manage textbook quality and demonstrate design features, help reviewers examine textbooks’ correspondence with curriculum guidelines and their accuracy of knowledge, facilitate editor-reviewer negotiations through systemic reform, and improve the diversity of textbooks’ content design.