英文摘要 |
William Makepeace Thackeray has garnered his reputation as a novelist who refused to be finalized in novel writing. His fiction, in many aspects though, possessed diverse and mixed characteristics of Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-century novels, yet his virtuosity in effect allowed him to defya gradual fixation and finalization that were shown in novels before his time. While Victorian novelists, for instance, oftentimes ended their characterization in a well-rounded depiction about how characters reached their Bildungsroman in their closure, his Vanity Fair gave us a strong sense of his discontentedness with idealized closing she had found in the hands of previous writers. Sucha pungent sense of either restlessness or angst for the danger of finalizationin effect urged Thackeray on his quest for the novelization of the novelas a genre, a processfully and fluently expressed in Vanity Fair. With the help of a Bakhtinean concept, unfinalizability, this present paper is to explore how Thackeray achieves his uniqueness and unfinalizable characterization of Vanity Fair, "a Novel without a Hero," where the novelist shuns away from fixation and finalization, and where there is no ultimate, determinate presence of idealized characters, and where all important personas have to mature in the world without God, and even to grow out of the fictionality, yet into the disclosure of the reality they all face. |