行為質轉與刑法第一八五條第一項之解釋

Perversion and Features Interpretation of Section 185 of the Criminal Code

近年來最高法院援引德國多數見解，藉由所謂的交通敵對意圖評價日常交通行為是否構成刑法第185條規定的他法。本文認為，此種行為質轉條件本質上為倫理性的主觀惡意，再加上不當發展成所謂的損害故意，導致外部型侵害（非交通行為）仍以危險故意為主觀歸責之基礎，內部型侵害（交通行為）卻是要求至損害故意的程度，而有牴觸罪刑相當原則之疑慮。

In recent years, the Supreme Court has cited the majorityopinion of Germany, using the so-called hostile intent to evaluatewhether daily traffic behavior constitutes another law underArticle 185 of the Criminal Code. This article believes that thiskind of behavioral qualitative conversion conditions are actuallyethical subjective maliciousness, coupled with the developmentof improper intentions into damage intentions, The external typeof infringement (non-traffic behavior) is still based on thesubjective imputation of dangerous intention, but the internaltype of infringement (traffic behavior) is required to the extent ofintentional damage. There are doubts about violating theprinciple of equivalence of crimes and penalties.