英文摘要 |
"As a response to the national crisis and the writing maladies in the 1960's affected by Modernism, the postwar poets of the first generation in the 1970's had proposed a series of claims of poetries through organizing poetry journals. The poetries presented in the journals were a practice of their claims, in which images were formed based on meanings through a large number of Chinese symbols. With their actions involving the room of representing the nation through poetry texts, these poets reiterated their ambition of constructing the ideal nation through repetitive forming of the image of China. Nonetheless, with regard to poetry aesthetics and historical image creation, the utilization of Chinese symbols by generation groups also involve choices, applications and even the different complex phenomena derived from the transformation of cultural and psychological perspectives. This research paper aims to study how the postwar poets of the first generation in the 1970's accomplished the nation via applying Chinese image symbols and the changes of perspective process took place sequentially. First of all, this paper views the Chinese classical scenarios with sentimental qualities presented primarily by the postwar poets of the first generation, discussing the theme issues of modern writings existed in the Chinese way based on language experiences. Secondly, this paper analyzes the strong passion for Chinese symbols and construction of the self-survival space of the Malaysian-Chinese poets from Shen Zhou Poetry Club, whose contextual relation with the dream vision of Guang-Jhong Yu, the postwar poet, after he contemplated the NPM-style Chinese symbols is then analyzed. Moreover, this paper further compares the way Taiwanese poets proposed the subtle conventional/modern/practical spectral structure of the Chinese image through their local experiences of the era. This highlights the minor discrepancies between the applications of Chinese symbols of the postwar poets of the first generation in the 1970's from various poetry clubs. It can be discovered from detailed discussions that the postwar poets of the first generation had not produced their works of the Chinese image from the viewpoints of descendents (orphans) sorrowfully. Instead, they constructed the room of the image of China via poetries and gestated their sense of self-subjectivity. In addition, they consciously referred to the reflection of the image of China and produced a crack of national crisis on the mirror of reflection, injecting the practical light of the time and introspecting their self-subjectivity which was reflected in the lingering tincture. " |