英文摘要 |
"The new provisions about juveniles of Civil Code and the 11th Amendment of Criminal Law express the necessity of research of joint application of civil law and criminal law in connecting the new key conceptions of the Juveniles Protection Law in the approach of unification of legal order. In the typical field of the guardianship system, whether parental abuse of guardianship constitutes a crime should be based on the distinction between parental rights and guardianship, combined with the effect of civil liability investigation and the related charges in criminal law to make a substantive judgment. In the typical field related to adoption, when distinguishing between civil adoption and child trafficking, the two purposes of selling and illegal profit should be clarified. In the typical field of special statute of limitations for sexual assault of minors, the interpretation of ''sexual assault'' in civil law should refer to the provisions of the criminal law, the former is broader than the latter in scope. Compared with the limitation of action in the criminal law, the effectiveness of Article 191 of the Civil Code is more symbolic. The application of the juvenile protection system should follow the rule of joint governance by both criminal law and civil law. On the distinction of criminal responsibility and civil responsibility, we should pay full attention to the role of subjective elements, and consider whether the act constitutes a crime substantively based on the integration of criminal law and the principle of being most beneficial to minors within the framework of the current criminal system, so as to avoid the excessive involvement of criminal law in the civil field. By adhering to the principle of priority of civil law and abiding by the modesty of criminal law, the integration of civil law and criminal law can be realized to the greatest extent." |