英文摘要 |
The difference between the Okinawa independence movement and other regions striving for Independence lies in the historical status of the Ryukyu is lands for Ryukyu Kingdom was recognized as asovereign state by the international law through signing treaties with Britain, France, the United States and the Netherlands. But even so, the kingdom was regarded as Ryōseikoku (provinces of Japan) by the Meiji government of the Empire of Japan. In 1871, the policy of Haihan-chiken, an administrative reform, was implemented, through which the Ryukyu Kingdom turned into the Ryukyu Domain (1872-1879). In 1879, the kingdom-domain was abolished and formally annexed into the modern Japanese Empire (1868-1947) as Okinawa Prefecture. Besides, the trajectory of the involvement of three Great Powers in the Okinawa independence movement is also noteworthy. Sometimes, the campaigners advocate separation from Japan whiles the movement also eager to break from the US. Although Ryukyu was once regarded as atributary state of China, however, PRC's inconsistent stance is in favor of Okinawan independence. As aresult, the Okinawa independence movement turned more entwined. This paper attempts to examine along-run of Okinawan movement aiming for the separation from Japan since 1879 as well as the later Okinawa independence movement which tried to teamed up with the US power to achieve the goal. In 1970s, Okinawa was returned to Japan, anew trend was sprouting on the path to the Independence. Afurther analysis on the issues of internal and external that the Okinawa independence movement encountered will also be explored. |