英文摘要 |
A FCM’s segregation of customer funds forms the foundation of the futures industry’s customer protection regime. The clients’assets held in a futures account at an FCM, a bank or clearing house, as belonging to such customer, are protected, and governed specifically by the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations that require the“segregation”of cash and collateral deposited by customers in conjunction with their futures trading preventing from third-party claims while the deposited institutions insolvency. The CFTC has taken several regulation changes protecting certain margin collateral of FCM customers following the collapses of Lehman Brothers, MF Global and Peregrine Finical Group. The Dodd-Frank Act promotes central clearing as the primary method for managing counterparty risk in OTC derivative swap transactions. The LSOC Model which the CFTC has required for cleared OTC swaps. The LSOC Model offers customers greater protection than the Futures Model against fellow customer risk when double default happens. Because in LSOC model a non-defaulting customer’s margin cannot be used to cover the losses stemming from another customer’s default. This article highlights the arrangements and design of customer asset protection as well as examines the evolution the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulation for futures and cleared OTC swaps by comparative method. In final, it explores the regulation of customer margin accounts in Taiwan’s futures and OTC derivatives market and analyzes what we should do in the future for the article’s conclusion. |