英文摘要 |
The members of the apartment building management committee in Taiwan are re-elected every year and most of them do not have a background in property management. Especially when the management committee is first established, these novice members usually have no idea what their most important tasks are. Because no one is willing to serve as members of the management committee in some communities, they have the condo owners take turns performing the duty. As a result, most of the committee members are not familiar with their jobs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to systematically sort out job descriptions of a community management committee, classify them and explore them one by one. This study explores the weight ratio of key positions of management committees through literature retrieval and hierarchical analysis. By analyzing the results of a questionnaire designed by AHP experts, it is concluded that the evaluation aspects of the key functions of a community management committee, in order of size of weighting, are: (1) The aspect of financial and budget management and execution with a fifty five percent (55%) weighting, (2) The aspect of cleaning, maintenance, repairs and general improvement of the common and shared parts with a twenty four percent (24%) weighting, and (3) The aspect of enacting rules and regulations, holding meetings and coordination between residents with a twenty one percent (21%) weighting. As a result of ranking indicators of the key functions of a community management committee in order of importance, the top five management sub-factors are: (1) The sub-factor of public bidding system for high-value procurement: 14.1%, (2) The sub-factor of compiling and auditing financial statements: 12.2%, (3) The sub-factor of announcing financial statements: 12.2%, (4) The sub-factor of prevention mechanism against graft or absconding with money: 9.4%, and (5) The sub-factor of public safety inspection and firefighting equipment maintenance: 7.1%. Some of the top five management sub-factors identified by this study may be neglected by the community, so it is suggested that the community may refer to these sub-factors and elect management committee members with the expertise in dealing with them. |