英文摘要 |
The purpose of this study is to understand the resistance and intervention between suicide prevention case managers and re-suicide attempt clients during the first period lasting three months. This research uses qualitative research methodology which uses in depth interviews, which involves 6 suicide prevention case managers to share their practical working experience. The findings are as follows, there are two types of resistance reasons: distrust and unsatisfied need; four types of resistance behaviors: Euphemistic rejection, straightforward rejection, escape from meeting, and rejection angrily. The intervention includes three categories: cognitive, emotional and behavioral classification. For cognitive category, it includes understanding the meaning of resistance behavior. For behavioral category, it contains 3 subcategories: establishing relationship while assessing the risk of suicide, being active building related relationship with client, and keeping client being independent. It presents locally cultural characteristics in the resistance reasons, behaviors of clients. There are 11 subcategories of being active actions in the intervention, and it also presents locally cultural characteristics. Case managers have difficult to keep empathy with clients because of being limited by the quantities of content of client's self-disclosure. All case managers keep clients being independent on their own while client's resistances are hard to break and lasting, case managers experience negative emotions. According to the findings, suggestions are made to serve as future researches, regarding the training of case managers, and the practical supervision in suicide prevention. |