恐怖主義的刑法規範識別

On the identification of Terrorism in Criminal Law

數據和歷史使人們產生了對恐怖主義現存、直接的經驗。這一感性認知驅動著刑法，加劇對恐怖活動犯罪的制裁，因此產生了法律工具主義的風險。要遏制這種風險就需要在理性層面揭示出恐怖主義的概念。恐怖主義本質上是一種思維，形成于本國的歷史文化環境，在中國表現出分裂主義與宗教極端主義相結合的思維系統，于是在意志的實踐層面體現出一種表演性暴力的現實。這種現實是揭示恐怖主義思維的關鍵，因此需要在犯罪構成要件的意義上進行表達。因為目的是思維的定在，所以構成要件將目的予以揭示才能將犯罪思維表徵出來。唯有通過短縮二行為犯的立法模式，針對恐怖主義的理性識別方法才能貫徹到司法實踐中去。

Data and history have produced an existing and direct experience of terrorism. This perceptual cognition drives the criminal law to aggravate the sanctions against terrorist activities, thus creating the risk of legal instrumentalism. H we want to control this kind of risk, we need to reveal the concept of terrorism on a rational level. Terrorism is essentially a kind of thinking, formed in the historical and cultural environment of the country, and shows a system of thinking that combines separatism with religious extreme thought in China. Thus, in the practice level of the will, a reality of performing violence is embodied. This kind of reality is the key to revealing the thinking of terrorism, so it needs to be expressed in the constituent elements of crimes. Because the purpose is to set the mind, it is necessary to reveal the purpose in the constituent elements to characterize the criminal thinking. Only through the legislative model of verkuemmert zweiaktige delikte, the rational identification method of terrorism can he implemented in judicial practice.