評鑑的制度化與制度的評鑑化

Institutionalized Evaluation and Evaluationalized Institution

研究以社會學相關教師為對象進行，透過數十人次的焦點團體及個別訪談，應用新制度理論的觀點，勾勒系所評鑑由單一活動成為完整制度的過程。研究發現，源自新自由主義精神、講求可課責性的系所評鑑，一方面委由學界進行同儕主觀性的自主審查，一方面則由中心協助建置客觀性的效標，成為目的曖昧但流程嚴格的「制度化的評鑑」。制度化評鑑的客觀計分指標，再被大學複製成為內部教師評鑑的準則，並將教學研究的內涵化約為全面性、定期性、數量性的評比獎懲，成為「評鑑化的制度」。這個過程形塑了新的制度性環境，迫使教研人員放棄傳統師生倫理的教育理念，轉而追求具有制度正當性的出版績效。

This paper argued that changes in the academic climate from 2006 to 2011 was related to the “Program Evaluation” to the universities in Taiwan, which was commissioned by the Ministry of Education and executed by the Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan. This study interviewed 23 sociology-related faculties (through focus groups and individual interviews) as research objects, and used Neo-institutionalism theory to figure out how the Program Evaluation event transformed into a austere institution. This research found that the Program Evaluation, which was at first based on neo-liberalist concept of “accountability”