英文摘要 |
The Symphonische Dichtung, the innovative and controversial orchestral genre of the mid-nineteenth century through which Liszt presented himself as an avant-garde composer, is usually translated into English as''symphonic poem.'' Liszt used the term poèmes symphoniques early in the development of the genre and only later used the term symphonische Dichtung when publishing the works. This terminological variability raises the question of what, precisely, Liszt understood as a''poem'' or''poetry'' and its relevance to the formation of this symphonic genre. In his article''Berlioz und seine Harold Symphonie'' (“Berlioz and his Harold Symphony''), published in 1855, Liszt presented the essential concepts informing his conception of programmatic or''poetic'' music. The essay suggests that the ideas invoked by the term Symphonische Dichtung go beyond its English translation to encompass''poetry'' in broader terms. The purpose of this article is to examine this larger conception of''poetry,'' considering Friedrich Schlegel’s account of Dichtung, Liszt’s theoretical writings on the program symphony, and related compositional issues in Liszt’s symphonic works. Certain of Schlegel’s ideas, such as the''moment of reflection'' and the''mixture of different literary genres,'' can clarify the somewhat ambiguous concepts of''modern heroes'' and''philosophical epopoeias'' Liszt developed in his account of program music. Schlegel’s writings also provide a context in which to understand the way Liszt surpasses the framework provided by literary structures in developing his compositional ideas. |