英文摘要 |
Overweight and obesity have been associated with a variety of chronic diseases and impairment in executive function of all age groups. Both continuous aerobic exercise training and intermittent/ interval training were reported to be beneficial for overall health and cardiovascular fitness. In recent years, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) had been shown to be more effective and time-efficient as compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Short-term moderate- to high-intensity interval training intervention had also induced modest body composition improvements in overweight and obese individuals. Although many studies reported HIIT to be more superior than MICT, with effective intensity ranging from moderate- to high-intensity intermittent or all-out. However, an effective and practical approach for managing overweight required a long-term strategy. This paper reviewed the adherence to HIIT in relation to its intensity, interval, and its applications in real world for overweight or obese adults. Reports on levels of affective response and enjoyment in MICT and HIIT are inconsistent, and could be due to discrepancies of the protocols and stages of training, as well as participants' fitness levels and competencies. Some studies indicated that lower intensity and/ or shorter interval in HIIT improved pleasure and enjoyment during exercise. Among inactive and overweight adults, increased in exercise intensity above the ventilatory threshold appeared to have a negative effect on the affective response. Exercise competency could also be a critical factor contributing to the enjoyment of HIIT. High enjoyment for variations of interval style training could be achieved if the intensity was reduced and duration of the interval was lengthened beyond the traditional 30-s all-out bouts, which ultimately improved a weight management program. For the enhancement of overall quality of the study on effectiveness and exercise adherence, a longer period of intervention should be considered. In future studies, other factors such as session attendance, adherence rate and adverse events should be included to ascertain their potential roles. |